Academic Jobs - Home of Higher Ed Logo

Diamond Open Access Publishing: Australian Universities Urged to Value Local Journals

96views
Submit News
Several sparkling diamonds scattered on orange background
Photo by Logan Voss on Unsplash

In the evolving landscape of scholarly communication, diamond open access publishing stands out as a beacon of equity and accessibility. This model, where journals charge neither authors nor readers any fees, has taken root in Australia, powering hundreds of local academic journals that deliver vital research without financial barriers. Yet, despite their contributions, these publications often struggle for recognition and support from the very universities they serve. Recent calls from experts and policymakers urge Australian institutions to prioritize and invest in these homegrown outlets, fostering a more sustainable and nationally relevant research ecosystem.

Diamond open access, sometimes called platinum open access, flips the traditional publishing script. Unlike gold open access, which typically involves article processing charges paid by authors or their funders, or green open access, where authors self-archive versions after an embargo, diamond OA provides immediate, full access to peer-reviewed content at no cost to anyone. Funded through university subsidies, society memberships, or grants, these journals embody the public good principle of scholarly publishing—knowledge freely shared for societal benefit.

Australia boasts a robust network of such journals, covering fields from Indigenous studies to environmental science and law. Their value lies not just in accessibility but in their deep attunement to local contexts, addressing issues like climate adaptation in the Outback or policy reforms tailored to Pacific regional dynamics.

Diamond OA's Strong Foothold in Australian Scholarship

A survey of 139 Australian journal editors revealed that around 41 percent operate under the diamond model, making it the dominant form among local publications. These journals number over 650 in total, with about a third fully diamond OA. They punch above their weight: research shows Australian journals are cited far more frequently in national government policy documents than international counterparts, underscoring their real-world impact.

Take the Australian eJournal of Theology from Australian Catholic University or the Melbourne University Law Review. These outlets publish cutting-edge work on topics uniquely Australian, from reconciliation with First Nations peoples to legal frameworks for renewable energy transitions. Deakin University Library, for instance, supports six diamond journals, including the Deakin Law Review and Journal of Citizenship and Globalisation Studies, demonstrating how institutional backing can sustain quality output.

Statistics highlight their reach: diamond journals contribute significantly to Australia's open access landscape, with no APCs ensuring researchers without grants—early-career scholars or those in humanities—can publish freely. This democratizes knowledge production, amplifying voices from regional universities like Charles Sturt or James Cook.

The Australian Research Council's Bold Open Access Shift

The Australian Research Council (ARC) has catalyzed change with its updated Open Access Policy, effective July 1, 2026. For grants opening after this date, journal articles and conference papers must be openly accessible immediately upon publication—a leap from the previous 12-month embargo. Monographs and book chapters follow within 12 months, with DOIs required for all outputs.

This policy aligns perfectly with diamond OA, as it mandates fee-free public access for taxpayer-funded research. By removing embargoes, the ARC reduces reliance on hybrid gold models that drain institutional budgets through transformative agreements. Australian universities, already spending millions annually on publisher deals, stand to save substantially by channeling support to diamond journals that meet these requirements natively.

Experts argue this creates a ripe opportunity: universities can redirect read-and-publish funds to bolster local diamond outlets, ensuring compliance while nurturing national scholarship infrastructure.

Insights from Editors: Roles and Realities

Editors of Australian journals play multifaceted roles—peer review coordination, marketing, even IT maintenance—often on top of full-time teaching loads. The aforementioned survey found 45 percent receive no compensation, relying on passion and institutional goodwill. Many report burnout, with succession planning a major headache; several journals have shuttered due to lack of volunteers.

Despite this, editors value their journals' niche expertise. Humanities and social sciences titles excel in local relevance, while STEM journals offer rigorous, context-specific insights. Interviews with 27 editors highlighted pride in serving Australian audiences but frustration over workload de-recognition in university performance metrics.

To thrive, editors call for formal workload allocations (e.g., 0.2 FTE for editorship), library-hosted platforms like Open Journal Systems, and inclusion in research assessments.

Map highlighting Australian universities hosting diamond open access journals

Spotlight on Success Stories

Deakin's suite exemplifies institutional commitment. The Deakin Law Review publishes annually on contemporary legal issues, freely accessible via OJS. Similarly, the University of Melbourne's Melbourne Asia Review disseminates Asia-Pacific policy analysis, cited in diplomatic circles.

Student Success, supported by University of Southern Queensland Library, aids higher education practitioners nationwide. These cases show diamond OA's viability when libraries provide hosting, DOI registration, and indexing assistance—ensuring discoverability in Scopus or DOAJ.

Broader networks like the Australian Scholarly Communications Community of Practice (AuSCCoP) Diamond subgroup, launched in 2024, unite librarians and publishers for webinars, best practices, and advocacy. Their efforts, including DOAJ indexing guides, boost visibility.

brown concrete building during daytime

Photo by Eriksson Luo on Unsplash

Benefits for Universities and Researchers

Supporting diamond OA yields multifaceted gains. For universities, it's cost-effective: no APCs mean savings redirected to infrastructure. Enhanced prestige follows as local journals gain traction, fulfilling ARC mandates effortlessly.

Researchers benefit from barrier-free publishing, vital for non-ARC funded work. Early-career academics, often grant-poor, publish sooner, building CVs without debt. Local focus accelerates impact—e.g., environmental journals informing drought policy.

  • Increased citations in national contexts
  • Diversity: amplifies regional, Indigenous voices
  • Sustainability: community-owned, less profit-driven
  • Training: hones editing skills for future leaders

For higher education careers, editorial roles signal leadership, aiding promotions. The ARC policy further incentivizes this pathway.

Persistent Challenges and Roadblocks

Volunteer dependency remains paramount: 45 percent unpaid editors face burnout, threatening closures. Visibility lags—many diamond journals absent from high-impact lists, skewing assessments toward international prestige.

Funding scarcity hits hard; small grants evaporate amid budgets. Technical hurdles like platform migration burden volunteers. Globally, diamond OA thrives in Europe via consortia, but Australia lags coordinated support.

Yet, solutions emerge: workload recognition, library collectives via CAUL, and policy tweaks valuing local impact.

Building Sustainable Pathways Forward

The AuSCCoP subgroup models collaboration: bi-monthly meetings tackle funding, platforms, indexing. International inspiration abounds—Canada's SSHRC funds diamond journals; Norway expands subsidies.

Australian universities could emulate: allocate 0.1-0.2 FTE for editors, subsidize hosting via CAUL, reform assessments to credit local pubs. Philanthropy and grants fill gaps.

Recent advocacy emphasizes urgency: invest now or lose infrastructure.

Global Lessons for Australia's Diamond Future

Europe's DIAMAS project maps diamond ecosystems; the Open Journals Collective flips paywalls via libraries. Australia can adapt: DOAJ's Australian gems post highlights community momentum.

AuSCCoP's mission aligns, promising equitable OA.

Career Implications in Higher Education

For academics, diamond journals offer publishing outlets sans fees, bolstering profiles. Universities gain by retaining talent through recognized service roles. As ARC enforces OA, diamond support becomes strategic—enhancing compliance, impact, recruitment.

Explore opportunities at Australian university jobs.

The University of Melbourne

Photo by Eriksson Luo on Unsplash

Outlook: A Brighter Horizon for Local Scholarship

With ARC's 2026 policy and grassroots efforts, diamond OA poised for growth. Universities investing now reap rewards: cost savings, national relevance, global standing. The time to value local journals is here—ensuring Australian research shines freely for generations.

Portrait of Jarrod Kanizay
About the author

Jarrod KanizayView author

Academic Jobs In House Author

Discussion

Sort by:

Be the first to comment on this article!

You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

New0 comments

Join the conversation!

Add your comments now!

Have your say

Engagement level

Browse by Faculty

Browse by Subject

Frequently Asked Questions

💎What is diamond open access publishing?

Diamond open access (OA) is a model where scholarly journals provide free reading and publishing without article processing charges (APCs) or subscriptions. Funded by institutions or grants, it ensures equitable access to research.

📊How prevalent is diamond OA in Australia?

About 41% of Australian journals are diamond OA, totaling around 200 out of 650. They cover diverse fields and are cited more in national policy than international equivalents.

📜What does the ARC's 2026 Open Access Policy require?

From July 2026, ARC-funded journal articles and conference papers must be openly accessible immediately. This supports diamond OA by prioritizing fee-free, immediate public access.

⚠️What challenges do Australian diamond journals face?

Key issues include volunteer labor (45% editors unpaid), funding shortages, succession gaps, and low visibility in assessments favoring international journals.

🤝How can universities support local diamond journals?

Allocate editorial workload (0.1-0.2 FTE), provide library hosting, reform assessments to value local impact, and redirect publisher savings to subsidies.

📚Examples of Australian diamond OA journals?

Notable ones: Deakin Law Review, Melbourne University Law Review, Australian eJournal of Theology, Student Success. Many hosted by university libraries.

Benefits of diamond OA for researchers?

No APCs enable grant-poor scholars to publish; boosts local impact, CV building, and compliance with ARC rules without extra costs.

⚖️How does diamond OA differ from gold OA?

Gold OA charges APCs (often $2k-$5k); diamond is fee-free for all, community-funded, avoiding author-pays inequities.

🌐Role of AuSCCoP in diamond publishing?

The subgroup fosters best practices, webinars, and advocacy for sustainable diamond OA through collaboration among libraries and publishers.

🔮Future outlook for Australian diamond journals?

ARC policy and advocacy signal growth; coordinated support could prevent closures, enhancing national research sovereignty.

💼Impact on higher ed careers?

Editorial roles build leadership skills, aiding promotions. Diamond OA opens publishing avenues, vital for early-career academics.