Positive Momentum in Student Persistence Across Australian Universities
Australian universities are witnessing a welcome uptick in student retention, particularly among underrepresented equity groups, according to the latest analysis from the Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success (ACSES). The report, titled Retention rates in Australian higher education: Analysis of 2024 data (2026 update), reveals that the proportion of domestic undergraduate students returning for their second year reached 86.1% in 2024 for Table A public universities. This marks a significant rebound from the 83.5% low in 2022, signaling improved student success amid post-pandemic recovery.
This progress is especially notable for equity groups—students from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds, regional and remote areas, those with disabilities, and First Nations Australians—who have historically faced higher attrition. While gaps remain, the data underscores the impact of targeted supports and institutional efforts in fostering persistence.
Defining Retention and Equity Groups in Higher Education
Student retention refers to the percentage of full-time, domestic commencing undergraduate students who continue their studies into a second year at the same institution. It's a critical metric for gauging not just enrollment but genuine student success and equity in higher education. Equity groups, as defined by the Australian Department of Education, encompass populations underrepresented relative to their share of the general population: First Nations peoples (3.8% of population but 2.6% of commencements), low SES (25% population, 17% commencements), regional/remote (27.1% population, 20.1% commencements), and students with disabilities (now 12.4% of commencements, up due to better reporting).
These groups often navigate additional barriers like financial pressures, geographic isolation, cultural disconnection, and lack of support services, making their retention a barometer for systemic inclusivity.
Key Statistics: Retention Rates by Equity Group in 2024
The ACSES report provides granular insights into 2023 cohort retention (returning in 2024) across Table A providers:
| Group | Retention Rate |
|---|---|
| Non-equity | 88.2% |
| Disability | 84.2% |
| Regional | 81.4% |
| Low SES | 80.9% |
| Remote | 79.1% |
| First Nations | 75.1% |
All equity groups showed improvement from prior years, with sector-wide attrition dropping to 12.2%—the lowest in a decade. Group of Eight (Go8) universities led with rates like 89.4% for First Nations students, while Regional Universities Network (RUN) averaged lower at 73.4% for the same group.
Historical Trends: From Pandemic Dip to Recovery
Retention fluctuated from 84.3% in 2016 to a peak of 85.7% in 2019, dipping during COVID to 83.5% in 2022 before surging to 86.1% in 2024. Equity groups mirrored this: First Nations rates hovered 71-75%, remote around 75-80%, but all rose in 2023/2024. Low SES saw a slight long-term decline (81.3% to 80.9%), highlighting persistent challenges.
Photo by Eriksson Luo on Unsplash
- Non-equity consistently highest (~87-88%).
- Metropolitan equity students outperform regional/remote peers by 5-10 points.
- Multiple equity statuses (e.g., remote low SES) compound risks, dropping to ~75%.
Institutional Variations: Leaders and Laggards
Wide disparities exist: remote students' retention spans 46% to 100% across institutions, First Nations 54-97%. Go8 averages exceed 90% for most groups, attributed to resources and selective admissions. Top equity performers like University of Wollongong (ranked #1 for equity in AFR 2024) emphasize outreach.Full ACSES institutional data reveals negative correlations between equity participation share and retention—unis with more equity students often have lower rates, urging balanced benchmarks.
Factors Driving Retention Success and Challenges
Key influencers include prior academic achievement, full-time study mode, financial aid, mental health support, and sense of belonging. Equity students face compounded issues: 36% of First Nations are low SES, 44% regional/remote low SES overlap. Pandemic-era flexible learning helped, but isolation and costs persist. TEQSA notes institutional strategies like early alerts and mentoring boost outcomes.TEQSA Good Practice Note
Proven Initiatives Boosting Equity Retention
Successful programs include Charles Sturt's Retention Framework (eight focus areas: orientation, advising), UOW's equity scholarships, and Federation University's interventions blending HE and TAFE. NCSEHE recommends peer mentoring, financial literacy, and culturally safe spaces. HEPPP funding (ending 2025) supported many, transitioning to National Equity Fund.
- Targeted supports: First-year experience extensions.
- Flexible pathways: Enabling courses up 14.6% in 2024.
- Data-driven: Early intervention via analytics.
Government Policies Shaping the Future
The Australian University Accord emphasizes equity, with 20,000 additional places for underrepresented groups. From 2026, new funding replaces HEPPP, prioritizing progression. Dept data shows success rates at 87.9% record high, completion up. Policies like fee-free TAFE divert some but aid overall pathways. 2024 Student Statistics
Expert Views: Beyond the Numbers
ACSES's Associate Prof. Gemma Cadby stresses: “Retention data is a starting point... we need detailed factors like attendance mode and services.” Experts call for intersectional analysis and benchmarking against similar demographics to avoid misleading comparisons.
Outlook: Sustaining Gains for True Equity
With enrollment booming (domestic up 1%, intl 17.7%), sustaining 86%+ retention requires investment. Projections: equity participation to rise via Accord targets. Actionable insights: scale mentoring, enhance data sharing, integrate VET pathways. Australian HE stands at a pivotal moment for inclusive excellence.
