The University of Queensland Press (UQP), the publishing arm of one of Australia's leading research institutions, has ignited a fierce debate within the higher education and literary communities by cancelling the publication of an Indigenous children's book. The decision, announced on April 23, 2026, stems from concerns over illustrator Matt Chun's social media commentary, which the university deemed inconsistent with its policies on antisemitism. This move has prompted a wave of resignations from prominent authors, raising questions about academic freedom, institutional accountability, and the role of university presses in navigating political sensitivities.
At the heart of the controversy is Bila: A River Cycle, a lyrical adaptation of a poem by award-winning Wiradjuri poet Jazz Money. The book personifies the Bila (Macintyre) River, weaving themes of environmental stewardship and connection to Country through vivid watercolour and pencil illustrations by Chun. Originally slated for a June 2026 release, approximately 5,000 copies had already been printed before UQP halted distribution and began exploring recycling options.
The Spark: Matt Chun's Controversial Commentary
Matt Chun, a Melbourne-based illustrator known for his work in children's literature and activism, penned a Substack essay titled "We Don’t Mourn Fascists" on January 1, 2026. The piece responded to the Bondi Junction Westfield stabbing on December 14, 2025, which claimed 15 lives, including a 10-year-old child. Chun critiqued what he called the "Zionist framing" of the victims, associating some with Chabad, a Jewish organisation he linked to support for Israeli policies in Gaza. He argued that media portrayals granted 'default innocence' to victims based on 'whiteness, Jewishness, and the Bondi backdrop,' contrasting this with muted responses to violence against Palestinians and First Nations people.
Chun stood by his words, stating they were 'deeply considered' in consultation with Jewish antizionist allies and would 'stand the test of history.' However, the post drew swift condemnation. The Australian labelled it a 'tirade against Jews and Zionists,' prompting Dymocks bookstores to remove Chun's titles in January. New South Wales police announced an investigation into potential hate speech on April 24, 2026.
UQP's Decision and the University's Antisemitism Framework
UQP's publisher director Madonna Duffy informed staff on April 22 that the book would not proceed, as Chun's statements conflicted with the University of Queensland's (UQ) policies, particularly its definition of antisemitism. UQ adopted a formulation aligned with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition in early 2025, following Universities Australia's (UA) endorsement in February 2025. UA's version defines antisemitism as 'discrimination, prejudice, harassment, exclusion, vilification, intimidation or violence that impedes Jews' ability to study, research, work, participate and thrive in university life.' It includes examples like denying Jewish self-determination or applying double standards to Israel.
This marks the first known application of the policy to cancel a publication. UQ emphasised no issue with the book's content or Money's work, expressing regret and openness to future collaborations. Critics, however, decry it as preemptive censorship unrelated to the artwork.
Jazz Money's Heartfelt Response
For Jazz Money, whose debut collection untying the tongue won the 2021 David Unaipon Award, the cancellation is a personal and professional blow. 'It sucks for me that my book is getting cancelled,' she said, highlighting financial and reputational damage. More alarmingly, she views it as setting a 'disturbing precedent' where right-wing media campaigns can destroy even apolitical Indigenous stories about Country. Money, who has worked with UQP since 2020, no longer trusts the press and praised the solidarity from boycotting peers.
The environmental waste of 5,000 books underscores the decision's recklessness, amplifying calls for ethical publishing practices in academia.
A Growing Boycott: Prominent Authors Sever Ties
The backlash was immediate and seismic. Goorie poet Evelyn Araluen terminated her contract for a nonfiction book, repaying a $2,500 advance, labelling the act 'shameful and abhorrent' and 'culturally violent.' Miles Franklin winner Melissa Lucashenko sought legal advice on her forthcoming title, accusing UQP of 'caving to the Murdoch press.' Palestinian-Australian author Randa Abdel-Fattah withdrew her next book, decrying the empowerment of 'bullies' against First Nations queer writers.
- Omar Sakr, Sara M Saleh, Natalia Figueroa Barroso, and others followed suit.
- Over 30 authors signed an open letter urging UQP to publish despite pressures.
This echoes prior cultural boycotts, like Adelaide Writers' Week's collapse amid pro-Palestine tensions.
IHRA Definition in Australian Higher Education: A Divisive Tool
Australia's 39 universities, via UA, adopted an IHRA-aligned definition in 2025 amid rising campus antisemitism post-October 7, 2023. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) reported 1,858 incidents annually since then, with universities not immune. Critics, including Amnesty International and academics, warn it chills Palestine advocacy by conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism. UQ's application here tests its scope in creative spheres.ABC analysis of UA definition
Implications for Academic Freedom and University Publishing
University presses like UQP play a vital role in Australian higher education, championing diverse voices, especially Indigenous literature. UQP has a storied history in First Nations publishing, launching classics series and nurturing talents like Money. Yet, as arms of public institutions, they balance editorial independence with institutional values, funded partly by government grants and sales.
This incident spotlights tensions: Does a creator's external views taint affiliated work? Precedents include Melbourne University Publishing's 2019 restructure controversy. Experts argue robust debate, not cancellation, counters harmful ideas.
Stakeholder Perspectives: Jewish Community and Pro-Palestine Advocates
The Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies welcomed UQP's stance, with president Jason Steinberg stating such sentiments foster hate enabling attacks like Bondi. Pro-Palestine voices, including Money and Araluen, see it as McCarthyism silencing solidarity with Gaza amid 40,000+ Palestinian deaths.
A 2025 MIRRA report highlighted antisemitism frameworks in unis, urging nuanced implementation.The Conversation's expert take
Broader Challenges in Australian Higher Education
Australian universities face funding pressures, with presses reliant on sales amid declining enrolments. Controversies over political vetoes on grants underscore risks of external influence. The IHRA adoption addressed post-2023 antisemitism surges but sparked free speech fears, with inquiries like the 2024 parliamentary probe recommending clearer guidelines.
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
Future Outlook: Rebuilding Trust in University Publishing
UQP must navigate reputational damage, potentially losing key Indigenous talent. Universities may refine policies for nuance, distinguishing creator views from content. Actionable steps include transparent reviews, diverse advisory boards, and fostering dialogue. For higher ed stakeholders, this underscores balancing anti-discrimination with creative liberty, ensuring campuses remain vibrant forums.
As Australian academia grapples with global tensions, precedents like this could shape publishing ethics nationwide.