What is shark depredation?

Shark depredation (or 'cucut') occurs when sharks remove hooked fish from fishing gear before retrieval, causing economic losses and extra mortality. In tropical Australia, rates hit 50-85%. Learn more .

How effective was the RPELX device in the UWA study?

The RPELX reduced depredation probability by 63%, from 85% (control) to 26% (treatment) across 262 catches. It also cut bycatch and gear loss. Full study .

Where was the study conducted?

Trials at Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Indian Ocean, targeting demersal fish at 50-200m depths amid grey reef sharks.

Who led the UWA shark deterrents research?

Dr. Jonathan D. Mitchell (UWA Oceans Institute) and Victoria Camilieri-Asch, with collaborators from DPIRD, Stantec, and locals. Published in CSIRO's Marine & Freshwater Research .

It pulses 200V electromagnetic fields to overload sharks' ampullae of Lorenzini, stunning them temporarily without harm. Clips 50cm above hook.

What are economic impacts of shark depredation in Australia?

Up to 50% catch loss; WA recfishing loses millions yearly from $2.4b sector. RPELX saved ~A$10k gear for 6 fishers annually.

Does RPELX affect target fish catch rates?

CPUE dropped 43%, possibly from field deterrence, but landed fish quality soared 74% intact.

What other strategies reduce depredation?

Relocate frequently Fast reels/jigs No offal dumps Combine with deterrents for best results.

Implications for shark conservation?

Non-lethal; cuts retaliatory kills, bycatch, litter. Promotes coexistence in reef ecosystems.

Future research from UWA?

Habituation tests, redesigns, mainland WA/QLD trials. Careers in marine postdocs await.

Where to find UWA marine science opportunities?

UWA's Oceans Graduate School offers PhDs, research roles. Check research assistant jobs .

UWA Shark Deterrents Study: 63% Less Depredation

a close up of a surfboard with a shark's teeth painted on it — Photo by Jametlene Reskp on Unsplash

The Challenge of Shark Depredation in Tropical Australian Waters

Shark depredation, often called 'cucut' by local fishers in places like the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, refers to the frustrating phenomenon where sharks snatch hooked fish from lines or nets before they can be landed. This issue plagues fisheries worldwide, but in Australia's tropical regions, it hits particularly hard. In Western Australia alone, recreational fishing contributes around $2.4 billion to the economy annually, yet shark bite-offs erode these benefits by causing up to 50 percent catch losses in some areas. Commercial operators face even steeper costs from reduced yields, extra fuel for repeated drops, and damaged gear.

At the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, a remote Australian territory in the Indian Ocean, grey reef sharks swarm reef drop-offs, turning promising hauls into heartbreak. Previous surveys by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) estimated depredation rates as high as 65 percent in tests, fueling negative attitudes toward sharks and prompting unsustainable defensive measures. This human-wildlife conflict not only threatens fisher livelihoods but also heightens mortality for target species like snapper and cod, which might otherwise be released under bag limits.

Enter researchers from The University of Western Australia (UWA), who tackled this head-on with innovative technology, blending field trials, rigorous stats, and fisher collaboration to pioneer solutions.

UWA Researchers Pioneer RPELX Testing

Leading the charge was Dr. Jonathan D. Mitchell, an Adjunct Research Fellow at UWA's Oceans Institute and School of Biological Sciences. Joined by co-author Victoria Camilieri-Asch, also from UWA, the team partnered with local experts from Stantec, RPELX inventor David Smith, Bond University, DPIRD, and Cocos Marine Care. Funded by Parks Australia, their work culminated in a landmark paper published on February 26, 2026, in CSIRO's Marine and Freshwater Research journal (DOI: 10.1071/MF25165).

The RPELX device, purpose-built for line fishing, clips onto the mainline 50 centimeters above the hook. Unlike surfer deterrents, it's optimized for deepwater demersal fishing (50-200 meters), where snapper like ruby snapper (Etelis carbunculus) and flametail snapper (Etelis coruscans) thrive amid shark hotspots.

RPELX electrical shark deterrent attached to fishing line in action

Trials spanned 11 days in February-March 2024, involving six seasoned Cocos fishers across 51 sessions. Each session featured randomized control (no device) and treatment (RPELX on) lines, yielding 262 fish catches. Cameras like GoPro and Waterwolf captured shark behavior, confirming grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) as primary culprits.

Impressive Results: 63 Percent Depredation Reduction

The data spoke volumes. Control lines saw 85 percent of catches depredated (63 out of 74 events), with just 15 percent landed intact. RPELX lines slashed this to 26 percent (19 out of 74), landing 74 percent undamaged—a 63 percent drop in depredation probability per a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis. The model, explaining 35 percent of deviance, highlighted treatment and skipper skill as key predictors.

Shark bycatch plummeted, sparing species like whitetip reef sharks (Triaenodon obesus).
Gear loss minimized, saving an estimated A$9,828 yearly for six fishers.
Catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) dipped 43 percent (4.3 vs. 7.5 events/hour), likely from the field's brief deterrence of target fish, but time to first catch showed no significant difference.

Bonus footage revealed sharks veering away, stunned by the pulse, validating the tech's non-lethal edge.

How RPELX Targets Sharks' Super Senses

Sharks detect prey via ampullae of Lorenzini—gel-filled pores sensing bioelectric fields from heartbeats and muscles. RPELX exploits this with a 1.1-meter device outputting 200-volt pulses via USB-rechargeable battery (1.5-2 hours runtime). Pre-hook-up, its buoyant electrode floats up, invisible to bait. Post-hook, it sinks beside the fish, enveloping it in an overwhelming electromagnetic field that disorients approaching sharks without harming them long-term.

Dr. Mitchell explains: "The pulse overloads sensory pores, temporarily stunning the shark." Unlike magnets or lights tested elsewhere, RPELX suits line retrieval, a first in real-world deepwater trials.

a yellow background with the word study spelled out

Photo by Roman Kraft on Unsplash

Economic and Ecological Wins for Australian Fisheries

For Cocos' artisanal fishers, reliant on demersal lines for food security, RPELX means fewer losses amid 50 percent baseline depredation. Nationally, shark bite-offs cost millions; WA recfishers alone lose countless premium fish north of Geraldton. Reduced gear litter aids marine parks, while sparing released fish bolsters stocks.

Conservationally, it curbs retaliatory shark kills, protecting reef populations. Ms. Camilieri-Asch notes: "Depredation kills more targets than needed, threatening sustainability." UWA Professor Tim Langlois adds: "Non-lethal tools foster coexistence."

Research jobs in sustainable fisheries are booming at unis like UWA.

Fisher Tips: Beyond Tech for Bite-Off Prevention

Dr. Mitchell stresses combos:

Relocate often, avoiding boat clusters.
Reel faster with electric reels/handlines.
Switch to jigs/lures over bait.
Avoid offal dumps near spots.
Target less shark-prone species.

DPIRD's prior tests hit 65 percent reductions blending deterrents and tactics.

UWA's Oceans Institute: Hub for Marine Innovation

UWA's Oceans Graduate School drives such breakthroughs, training PhDs in shark ethology, fisheries acoustics, and ecology. Mitchell's adjunct role bridges academia-industry, exemplifying interdisciplinary impact. For aspiring marine scientists, UWA offers paths in research assistance, blending fieldwork with stats like GLM modeling.

Fishers using lines at Cocos Keeling Islands amid shark activity

Collaborations with DPIRD and Parks Australia underscore uni roles in policy.

Challenges Ahead and Next Steps

RPELX isn't perfect: Battery limits, shock risks, CPUE dips, seafloor snags (prompting off-switch abandons). Habituation needs monitoring; shallow-water tweaks pending. UWA eyes subsidies, redesigns (shorter cables, solar power), and trials in WA mainland, QLD reefs, longlines.

Global parallels: Similar woes in Pacific, US fisheries; RPELX scales promisingly.

Photo by David Trinks on Unsplash

Stakeholder Views: Fishers to Policymakers

Cocos Co-op lauds community buy-in; Recfishwest calls it 'headway' against WA's epidemic. Dr. Andrew Rowland (Recfishwest): "No silver bullet, but science-tech-behavior synergy works." Fishers report frustration easing, experiences salvaged.

For higher ed, it spotlights demand for ocean experts amid climate-fishery pressures.

Explore Australian uni opportunities.

Future Outlook: Sustainable Coexistence

This UWA-led advance heralds smarter fisheries, aligning conservation with economics. As oceans warm, shark-human overlaps grow; non-lethal tech is key. Aspiring researchers, check higher ed jobs, university jobs, or rate my professor for mentors. UWA exemplifies Australia's marine leadership—join the wave.