OfS Announces Working Group for Foreign Interference Safeguards

The Office for Students (OfS), England's higher education regulator, has taken a significant step to address growing concerns over foreign interference in universities. On March 26, 2026, the OfS revealed plans to develop a new statement of expectations specifically targeting arrangements between higher education institutions and overseas partners. This initiative aims to ensure that such partnerships do not compromise free speech or academic freedom, core pillars of UK higher education.

The announcement coincides with heightened geopolitical tensions and reports of undue influence from certain foreign states. Universities, which rely heavily on international collaborations for research funding, student recruitment, and knowledge exchange, now face explicit calls to scrutinize their global ties more rigorously.

Understanding Foreign Interference in Higher Education

Foreign interference refers to deceptive, coercive, corrupt, or criminal attempts by foreign states to influence decision-making or activities within UK universities. Unlike legitimate diplomatic or commercial engagements, which are transparent and mutually beneficial, interference often involves covert pressure to suppress dissenting views, manipulate research outcomes, or gather intelligence.

Common tactics include transnational repression, where individuals face threats or harassment for their work or opinions, and the exploitation of financial dependencies. For instance, funding conditions might implicitly require self-censorship on sensitive topics like human rights in regions such as Xinjiang or Hong Kong. Cyber threats and espionage also loom large, targeting valuable intellectual property generated in university labs.

Statistics underscore the urgency: OfS polling in 2025 revealed that 21% of research and teaching staff had self-censored due to external pressures, with foreign influence cited as a factor in several cases. MI5 briefings to over 70 vice-chancellors in February 2026 highlighted active threats, prompting the creation of an Academic Interference Reporting Route for direct government notifications.

The Role of the New Statement of Expectations

Expected to be finalized for the 2026/27 academic year, the statement will provide clear guidelines on how universities should structure contracts and partnerships with foreign entities. It builds directly on existing frameworks, emphasizing that any agreement must align with legal duties under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023.

Key elements likely include due diligence processes for vetting partners, clauses prohibiting censorship, and mechanisms for monitoring compliance. Universities will be expected to assess risks proactively, particularly in research collaborations or student exchange programs funded by high-risk states.

Arif Ahmed, OfS Director for Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom, emphasized: “Without free speech and academic freedom there is no higher education. It is vital for the survival of the sector that these attempts fail.” This statement positions the guidance as a protective measure rather than a restriction on global engagement.

Composition and Mandate of the OfS Working Group

To shape the statement, the OfS has assembled a diverse working group comprising university leaders, academic staff with expertise in foreign interference, affected students, and representatives from sector bodies and advocacy groups. This inclusive approach ensures practical, sector-informed recommendations.

The group's mandate focuses on real-world scenarios, such as scholarship agreements or joint research ventures that could inadvertently enable interference. Roundtable events preceding the announcement gathered insights on the problem's scale, informing the group's deliberations.

This collaborative model reflects the OfS's commitment to working constructively with the sector, avoiding top-down impositions that could stifle innovation.

Spotlight on China: Primary Source of Concerns

While the guidance applies broadly, scrutiny has intensified on partnerships with China, the world's second-largest economy and a major player in UK higher education. Chinese state-linked scholarships, Confucius Institutes, and research collaborations have drawn particular attention.

Confucius Institutes, cultural centers funded by Beijing, have faced closure or rebranding at several UK universities due to fears of propaganda dissemination and self-censorship. A 2025 report detailed how these entities influenced campus events to avoid criticism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Scholarship programs pose another risk: recipients, often from elite Chinese universities, have been pressured to monitor peers discussing taboo topics like Taiwan independence or the 1989 Tiananmen Square events. OfS Director Ahmed has called for “severe sanctions” against students caught spying, potentially breaching free speech duties.

Real-World Case Studies and Lessons Learned

Concrete examples illustrate the stakes. In 2022, Sheffield Hallam University halted academic Laura Murphy's research on Uyghur forced labor after commercial partners raised concerns tied to Chinese interests. The university later apologized, but the incident highlighted how financial ties can erode academic integrity.

More recently, in 2025, reports emerged of Chinese students at UK campuses coerced via WeChat groups to report “anti-China” activities. This led to investigations and calls for scholarship reviews. Similarly, researchers on Hong Kong democracy faced online harassment and visa pressures.

• Sheffield Hallam: Research suppression due to business links.
• Multiple universities: Confucius Institute closures amid propaganda fears.
• Scholarship scandals: Spying allegations prompting OfS inquiries.

These cases demonstrate the need for robust contractual safeguards and whistleblower protections.

Building on Existing Frameworks: Regulatory Advice 24 and Government Guidance

The new statement complements Regulatory Advice 24, published in June 2025. This document outlines a three-step compliance framework: confirming speech is lawful, taking practicable steps to enable it, and justifying any restrictions proportionately.

Additionally, the February 2026 government guidance equips providers to recognize risks like transnational repression, prevent via cybersecurity (NCSC standards), and report via dedicated channels like the OfS reportable events system or MI5's academic route.

Together, these form a comprehensive toolkit, with the statement providing tailored expectations for international deals.

Implications for University Leaders and Partnerships

UK universities, hosting over 700,000 international students (40% from China pre-2025 visa curbs), must balance revenue needs with security. Non-compliance could trigger OfS investigations, fines, or registration suspensions.

Positive outcomes include enhanced trust in UK HE's global reputation. Institutions like the University of Nottingham, which closed its Ningbo campus amid similar concerns, offer models for ethical divestment.

Steps for compliance:

• Conduct partner risk assessments.
• Incorporate free speech clauses in contracts.
• Train staff on interference indicators.
• Establish internal reporting lines.

Stakeholder Perspectives and Sector Reactions

Universities UK (UUK) welcomes proactive regulation but urges proportionality to avoid deterring legitimate ties. Student groups advocate for protections against repression, especially for diaspora communities.

Experts like those from the Policy Exchange think tank praise the move, citing 2025 Henry Jackson Society reports on CCP campus influence. Conversely, some academics worry about overreach chilling collaboration.

For detailed insights, see the full OfS press release and Times Higher Education coverage.

Preparing for Compliance: Actionable Steps for Institutions

Proactive preparation is key. Universities should audit existing partnerships, prioritizing those with state-linked entities. Legal reviews of contracts can identify vulnerabilities, while staff training—drawing from NCSC and NPSA resources—builds resilience.

Encourage a culture of openness: anonymous reporting portals and regular security audits foster vigilance without paranoia. Collaborations with peers via UUK or the Russell Group can share best practices.

Long-term, diversify funding sources to reduce over-reliance on single markets, safeguarding autonomy.

Photo by Ahmad Hanif on Unsplash

Future Outlook: Safeguarding UK Higher Education's Global Standing

As the statement rolls out, expect increased transparency in university disclosures and potential shifts in enrollment patterns. While challenges persist, this framework positions UK HE as a beacon of open inquiry amid global authoritarian pressures.

By prioritizing principles over expediency, universities can thrive internationally, contributing to national security and innovation. The OfS's measured approach signals a new era of resilient, values-driven partnerships.