Academic Jobs - Home of Higher Ed Logo

Massey University Reinstates In-Person Exams Against AI Cheating

180views
Submit News
a close up of a red machine in a room
Photo by Sean Foster on Unsplash

Massey's Bold Move Back to Traditional Exams

Massey University, one of New Zealand's largest institutions with a significant distance learning cohort, has announced a significant shift in its assessment strategy. Starting in Semester One 2026, the university will reinstate in-person exams for many courses. This decision marks a departure from the online supervised assessments that became commonplace during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary driver? Combating the rising threat of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled cheating, which has challenged academic integrity across higher education.

The change aims to create a fair and level playing field for all students, protecting the value of Massey qualifications. As AI tools like ChatGPT and advanced large language models become ubiquitous, educators have struggled to verify original work in remote settings. In-person exams eliminate many of these risks by requiring physical presence under supervision.

The Evolution of AI in New Zealand Higher Education

Generative AI exploded into public awareness with the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, quickly infiltrating classrooms worldwide. In New Zealand universities, initial responses varied. Early adopters experimented with AI for brainstorming and drafting, but concerns over misuse grew. By 2023, Massey reported at least 20 cases of students using ChatGPT to cheat, offering amnesty for confessions to encourage transparency.

Across the sector, AI misuse cases surged. The University of Waikato documented nearly 200 incidents since 2023, prompting shifts to oral assessments in some programs. National secondary school data showed exam breaches investigated rising 250% from 345 in 2019 to 876 in the previous year, with AI implicated in many. Universities faced a dilemma: ban AI outright or integrate it ethically?

Massey's Rocky Road with Online Proctoring

Post-2020, Massey leaned heavily on online supervised exams (OSEs) via platforms like Remote Proctor Now. These required webcams, microphones, and AI-human monitoring to detect irregularities. However, technical failures plagued the system. In June 2024, widespread glitches forced cancellation of exams for 2000 students, leading Massey to disable proctoring for the semester.

Privacy issues compounded problems, with students panning cameras around rooms and constant surveillance. False positives from AI detectors like Turnitin eroded trust—students' original work flagged as generated, sparking accusations of overreach. By September 2025, Massey joined Auckland and Victoria Universities in abandoning these tools, citing unreliability and research showing easy circumvention.

Graph illustrating false positives in AI detection tools used by New Zealand universities

Unreliable Tech: Why Detection Tools Failed

AI detectors promised salvation but delivered frustration. Tools analyzed text for 'AI fingerprints' like predictability, but non-native English speakers and formulaic writing often triggered flags. Students could 'humanize' AI output with free tools, rendering detectors obsolete. Dr. Angela Feekery of Massey's Tertiary Education Union noted, 'There's a lot of research saying AI detection doesn't work well.'

Massey processed 85,000 works through Turnitin in one semester, but inconsistencies led to its September 2025 shutdown. Alternatives like lockdown browsers were hackable. Lecturer estimates suggested 30-60% of remote exam-takers might use illicit aid, underscoring the need for robust solutions.

brown and white concrete building near green trees during daytime

Photo by Don T on Unsplash

Unpacking Massey's Generative AI Policy

Massey's Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment Policy, effective May 2025, provides a framework with four levels: No AI for exams; AI Planning for brainstorming; AI Collaboration for drafting with edits; and AI Exploration for creativity. Disclosure is mandatory, including prompts and modifications.

Exams fall under 'No AI,' now enforced via in-person invigilation. Breaches range from discussions to misconduct hearings. The policy emphasizes ethical use, fact-checking, and independent thought, aligning with broader academic integrity principles.

  • Prohibited: Submitting unedited AI as own work.
  • Required: Appendix with AI interactions.
  • Goal: Foster AI literacy without compromising standards.

Challenges for Distance and Disabled Students

Massey serves thousands of distance learners nationwide. Reinstating in-person exams means travel to hubs—likely pre-2019 style centers in major cities. Massive Magazine reported outrage, with students citing costs, logistics, and equity. Disability advocates highlighted uncertainties for impaired students, demanding accommodations like alternative formats.

While hubs aim to mitigate, rural students face barriers. Massey promises consultations, but early reactions on social media express frustration: 'This disadvantages distance learners who chose Massey for flexibility.'

Peers Across Aotearoa: NZ Universities' Responses

Massey isn't alone. Victoria University shifted some law courses to handwritten in-person exams in 2025, citing digital vulnerabilities. Auckland mixes formats, with 61% digital in 2024 dropping. Waikato favors orals post-200 cases. Otago and Canterbury explore vivas and labs.

A Spinoff analysis highlighted sector-wide rethinking, with pen-and-paper as 'gold standard' despite digital-native pushback. See RNZ's coverage on ditching detectors.

Comparison of AI assessment policies at New Zealand universities including Massey, Auckland, and Waikato

Statistics and Expert Insights

Quantifying AI cheating is tricky sans detectors, but trends emerge. Waikato's 200 cases signal scale. Lecturer Ulrich Speidel estimated high remote cheating rates. NCEA's breach surge foreshadows tertiary risks.

Experts advocate hybrid models: in-person for high-stakes, AI-permissive for skills-building. Benefits include restored trust, skill assessment (handwriting, recall). Drawbacks: logistics, anxiety for some. Long-term, AI literacy training is key.

white and black concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Photo by Sulthan Auliya on Unsplash

Looking Ahead: Balancing Innovation and Integrity

Massey's move signals a pivot toward human-supervised assessments at milestones, blended with innovative formats like simulations. Nationwide, Universities New Zealand eyes coordinated strategies. For students, adapting means honing recall and ethics.

This evolution underscores higher education's resilience, ensuring degrees retain global value amid tech disruption.

Portrait of Sarah West
About the author

Sarah WestView author

Academic Jobs In House Author

Acknowledgements:

Discussion

Sort by:

Be the first to comment on this article!

You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

New0 comments

Join the conversation!

Add your comments now!

Have your say

Engagement level

Browse by Faculty

Browse by Subject

Frequently Asked Questions

📝Why is Massey University reinstating in-person exams?

To safeguard academic integrity against AI tools like ChatGPT, which enable easy cheating in online settings. Detection software proved unreliable.

📅When do the in-person exams start at Massey?

Semester One 2026, affecting many courses with exam hubs planned nationwide.

🤖What is Massey's AI Use Framework?

Four levels: No AI for exams, Planning, Collaboration, Exploration. Disclosure required for permitted uses.

🗺️How does this affect distance students?

Requires travel to exam centers, raising equity concerns. Accommodations under review.

Why were AI detectors abandoned?

False positives, easy bypassing, poor performance per research. Massey dropped Turnitin in 2025.

🏫What are other NZ universities doing?

Victoria: handwritten exams; Waikato: orals; Auckland: mixed. Trend to secured in-person assessments.

📊Are there stats on AI cheating in NZ?

Waikato: 200 cases since 2023. NCEA breaches up 250%. Exact uni figures limited post-detectors.

⚖️What penalties for AI misuse at Massey?

From warnings to misconduct hearings, per Academic Integrity Policy.

Benefits of in-person exams?

Ensures fairness, tests recall, reduces tech reliance. 'Gold standard' for integrity.

🔮Future of AI in NZ higher ed?

Ethical integration, literacy training, hybrid assessments. Coordinated national approach needed.

📚How to prepare for Massey's new exams?

Practice handwriting, time management, recall. Use permitted AI for study aids ethically.