The Office for Students (OfS), the independent regulator for higher education in England, has announced a major review into the Diploma in Education and Training (DET), a qualification designed to prepare individuals for teaching roles in the further education (FE) and skills sector. This Level 5 diploma, equivalent to the second year of an undergraduate degree, was eligible for funding through student loans via the Student Loans Company (SLC). Delivered by various higher education providers, including universities and their franchise partners, the course required students to complete 100 hours of teaching practice in relevant settings.

Concerns arose after OfS investigations revealed significant quality issues at specific providers, prompting this broader scrutiny. The review will examine student outcomes and the tuition fee funding disbursed for enrollments from the 2021-22 to 2023-24 academic years. With the DET replaced by the Diploma in Teaching (Further Education and Skills) in 2024 following a Department for Education (DfE) consultation, this probe highlights ongoing challenges in ensuring value for public money in teacher training programs.

What is the Diploma in Education and Training?

The DET served as a key entry point for aspiring further education teachers, who instruct post-16 learners in colleges, adult education centers, and skills training environments. Unlike school teacher training, which often leads to Qualified Teacher Status (QTS), the DET focused on practical skills for non-school settings. Students typically needed prior qualifications or experience, and the program blended theoretical modules with mandatory teaching placements.

Validated by Ofqual-regulated awarding bodies, the course was offered through higher education institutions registered with the OfS, making it eligible for SLC tuition fee loans up to around £7,000-£9,000 depending on delivery mode. Enrollment surged in recent years amid FE sector demands, but data on exact national figures remains limited pending the review. Providers often subcontracted delivery to franchise partners, a model now under intense scrutiny for oversight lapses.

The Scandals That Sparked the Review

The catalyst was OfS regulatory judgments against two providers: Applied Business Academy (ABA) in Luton and Canary Wharf, and Brit College in London. At ABA, which taught around 2,000 DET students, only 6% of logged placements met requirements. Investigations uncovered fictitious or inadequate sites, including cafés, clothing shops, freight firms, and building companies—far from educational contexts.

Brit College enrolled 1,174 students across five cohorts from 2022-23, receiving over £5 million in SLC fees. Yet, none received certificates due to failures in assessments, staff qualifications, and placement monitoring. ABA liquidated in October 2024 during the probe, while Brit College deregistered from the OfS and became insolvent in February 2025. These cases exposed governance gaps, with lead universities unable to enforce standards effectively.

Scope of the OfS Investigation

Expanding beyond these cases, the review targets most institutions delivering the DET from 2021-22 to 2023-24. It will compile data on student registrations, formal enrollments with awarding bodies, completion rates, certificates issued, and SLC tuition funding paid. Exclusions apply to minor providers and awarding bodies themselves, regulated by Ofqual.

The OfS aims to assess value for money, given students borrowed for courses yielding no qualifications. A forthcoming report will detail institution-level figures, informing potential sanctions or reforms. This aligns with OfS conditions of registration, mandating robust governance and student protection. For deeper insights, the OfS announcement outlines the methodology.

Student Outcomes and Personal Impacts

Across probed providers, zero DET certificates were awarded despite thousands enrolling and loans disbursed. Students, often mature learners from disadvantaged backgrounds or non-native English speakers, invested time and future repayments without gain. Many faced disrupted careers, unable to progress in FE teaching.

Non-completion stemmed from unmonitored placements, subpar assessments, and poor record-keeping. Broader data shows subcontracted courses have higher dropout risks, with OfS noting passive attendance monitoring deeming 'ghost students' as engaged. Affected individuals may seek refunds or alternative training, but recovery remains uncertain.

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Financial Ramifications for Public Funds

Millions in taxpayer-backed loans were paid to providers like Brit College (£5m+), with national totals pending. Lead providers retained margins before subcontracting, incentivizing enrollment over quality. The National Audit Office (NAO) previously flagged franchise risks, where 65% of such providers are unregistered with OfS, weakening oversight.

This review underscores systemic vulnerabilities in loan-funded subcontracting, echoing past scandals. Potential clawbacks or fines could follow, pressuring HE finances amid sector deficits. For context on franchise issues, see the detailed FE Week coverage.

Stakeholder Perspectives and Sector Reactions

FE leaders decry the DET's demise but acknowledge quality shortfalls exacerbated shortages. The Association of Colleges warns of recruitment crises, with FE teacher vacancies chronic. Universities UK stresses lead provider responsibilities, while the Education and Training Foundation calls for enhanced placement standards.

Regulators like OfS and SLC emphasize student protection, with SLC suspending payments during probes. Aspiring teachers express frustration online, highlighting loan burdens without qualifications. Experts view this as part of wider HE quality drives, including franchise reforms.

FE Teacher Recruitment Crisis in Context

UK FE faces acute shortages, with DfE forecasting 23% fewer school trainees needed but persistent gaps in post-16 skills. Turnover exceeds 15%, driven by low pay (average £32k vs. schools' £45k+), workload, and funding squeezes. DET issues compound this, as poor training deters entrants.

2025/26 saw ITT upticks, but FE lags. Solutions include bursaries, apprenticeships, and the new DiT, funded only via colleges/universities. NFER reports highlight retention woes, urging better support.

The New Diploma in Teaching: Reforms Ahead

DfE's 2024 replacement mandates stronger placements and alignment with FE needs, losing SLC funding for non-college/uni delivery. This curbs subcontract abuse but raises access concerns. LLE from 2027 may modularize training, enhancing flexibility amid lifelong learning pushes.

OfS consultations on LLE regulation ensure quality, with fee caps and registration mandatory. Providers must adapt, prioritizing outcomes over volume. For DfE details, visit their ITT guidance.

Implications for Higher Education Providers

Universities franchising DET face heightened scrutiny, risking OfS sanctions like registration revocation. Broader lessons apply to all loan-funded courses: robust contracts, placement verification, and data accuracy. Amid £24bn+ annual loan outlay, value-for-money audits intensify.

Positive shifts include AI monitoring and governance upgrades. For HE leaders, this signals prioritizing quality to safeguard public trust and funding.

Photo by Thomas de LUZE on Unsplash

Future Outlook and Actionable Insights

The review's report, expected soon, could reshape FE training oversight, bolstering protections. Amid recruitment crises, stakeholders urge incentives like salary uplifts and flexible routes. Aspiring FE teachers should verify provider OfS status and placement rigor.

HE institutions can proactive audit partnerships, invest in staff training, and align with LLE. This episode reinforces accountability, ensuring loans deliver skilled educators for UK's skills needs.