Resolution Foundation Report Highlights Stark Disparities in Student Housing Choices

A new analysis from the Resolution Foundation reveals that financial pressures are reshaping university decisions for thousands of young people across the United Kingdom. According to the organisation’s annual intergenerational audit, 52% of prospective undergraduates from England’s poorest neighbourhoods now expect to live at home while studying, compared with just 18% from the least deprived areas. Rising rents and everyday living costs are cited as the primary drivers behind this trend, limiting access to the traditional residential university experience for many from lower-income backgrounds.

The findings underscore how accommodation affordability is no longer a peripheral concern but a central factor influencing where students choose to study and how they experience higher education. Experts warn that this shift risks widening existing inequalities in access to networking, extracurricular activities and graduate opportunities.

Breakdown of Current Student Living Expenses

Recent data from the Save the Student National Student Money Survey paints a clear picture of the financial squeeze. The average monthly living cost for UK students stands at approximately £1,142, with rent accounting for the largest share at around £529. Groceries add another £146, while household bills, transport and social activities push totals higher still.

In London, figures climb significantly higher, often exceeding £1,400–£2,000 per month depending on lifestyle and location. Outside the capital, students in cities such as Manchester, Birmingham and Glasgow typically face monthly outgoings between £900 and £1,400. Purpose-built student accommodation rents have risen sharply, with the UK average annual cost now surpassing £7,500 in many areas.

These numbers come against a backdrop of maintenance loans that have not kept pace with inflation. In England, the maximum loan for students living away from home outside London is £10,830 per year, while those living with parents receive £9,118 – a difference that fails to reflect the realities of the private rental market.

Personal Stories: The Human Cost of Financial Constraint

Mariam, a student from a low-income London family, exemplifies the trade-offs many now face. Unable to afford capital rents, she commutes daily from her family home, often arriving home too exhausted to participate in evening events or networking opportunities. “I’m definitely missing out on the social side,” she explains. “But it also affects my future – those spontaneous coffees and introductions that others take for granted simply aren’t possible when you’re rushing for the last train.”

Similar accounts appear across university cities. Students report cutting back on food, heating and clothing to make ends meet, with many working part-time jobs that encroach on study time. Surveys indicate that 68% of full-time students now work an average of 13 hours per week, a record high, while 41% have considered dropping out due to money worries.

Photo by Wyatt Simpson on Unsplash

Expert Perspectives on Policy Shortfalls

Rose Stephenson, director of policy and strategy at the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi), has criticised the current funding model. “We have a system that assumes students can rely on family support, a housing market that makes moving out unaffordable, and policymakers still talking as if the traditional residential experience is the norm,” she notes.

The National Union of Students (NUS) has highlighted that a third of students live on less than £50 a month after covering rent and bills. Hepi research estimates that a participatory standard of living requires closer to £20,000 annually, far above current loan levels. These gaps are forcing difficult choices between debt, family support and part-time work.

Regional Variations and Accommodation Market Pressures

Costs vary dramatically by location. Students in northern England often pay around £530 monthly for rent, while those in the south face £626 and London students £743 on average. Purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) providers have seen strong rental growth, yet many beds now exceed the maximum maintenance loan, particularly in private developments.

Reports from Cushman & Wakefield indicate that 17% of beds in 2025/26 sit above the maximum loan threshold, up from just 3.7% in 2016/17. This mismatch is prompting some providers to offer concessions, while universities explore partnerships to increase affordable options.

Impacts on Academic Experience and Wellbeing

Living at home can reduce financial stress for some, yet it often comes with hidden costs. Commuting students report longer travel times, reduced access to campus resources and weaker peer networks. Mental health pressures intensify when students juggle work, study and family responsibilities without the support structures available in halls of residence.

Universities are responding with targeted initiatives, including hardship funds, subsidised travel passes and expanded wellbeing services. However, sector leaders acknowledge that systemic change is required to address root causes.

Photo by Gary Butterfield on Unsplash

Government and Regulatory Responses

The Office for Students (OfS) continues to monitor affordability and access, while the Department for Education reviews maintenance support levels. Calls for rent controls on student accommodation and increased maintenance loans have grown louder from student groups and think tanks alike.

Policy discussions also focus on expanding commuter-friendly infrastructure, such as improved rail links and flexible timetabling, to support those who must live at home.

Looking Ahead: Balancing Access and Experience

As the 2026/27 academic year approaches, universities, policymakers and accommodation providers face mounting pressure to adapt. Solutions range from more affordable on-campus options and targeted bursaries to broader reforms of student finance. Without meaningful intervention, the residential university experience risks becoming the preserve of wealthier students, undermining efforts to widen participation.

Stakeholders agree that ensuring all students can fully engage with higher education – regardless of background – remains essential to the sector’s long-term health and the UK’s social mobility goals.