Noam Chomsky, the Institute Professor Emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), has long bridged the worlds of linguistics and political critique. His analyses of U.S. foreign policy, particularly his framing of American actions as a form of imperialism, have profoundly shaped discussions within U.S. higher education. From public lectures to widely assigned books, Chomsky's work challenges students and faculty to reconsider the historical and contemporary dimensions of U.S. global power. This exploration delves into his 'Brief History of U.S. Imperialism' as presented in a 2022 interview, its academic reception, and its ongoing relevance in college classrooms across the country.

Chomsky's Academic Foundation at MIT

Noam Chomsky joined MIT in 1955, rising to become one of the most cited scholars in modern history primarily for revolutionizing linguistics with his theory of generative grammar. However, his political writings, starting prominently with critiques of the Vietnam War in the 1960s, established him as a leading voice against what he terms U.S. imperialism. Despite focusing his formal teaching on linguistics and philosophy, Chomsky's office hours and public engagements at MIT became hubs for political discourse, influencing generations of students in political science, history, and international relations departments.

MIT's Department of Linguistics and Philosophy lists Chomsky as Institute Professor Emeritus, underscoring his enduring institutional ties. His presence there symbolized academic freedom, allowing a tenured professor to openly challenge government policies without reprisal—a rarity that sparked debates on the role of universities in fostering dissent.

The 2022 Interview: Outlining a Brief History

In June 2022, on the KPFA radio show Letters and Politics hosted by Mitch Jeserich, Chomsky delivered what he titled a 'Brief History of U.S. Imperialism.' This discussion, later shared widely on YouTube, traces imperialism not as a post-1898 phenomenon but as inherent from the nation's founding. Chomsky defines imperialism broadly as 'the power that one country exerts over others,' encompassing military occupation, government overthrows, sanctions, and economic domination.

He highlights early examples like the displacement of Native American nations, the Mexican-American War—which Ulysses S. Grant later called 'one of the most wicked wars in history'—and continuous interventions. Chomsky argues U.S. imperialism evolved from direct conquest to 'soft power' mechanisms like sanctions on Cuba and Iran, often defying international consensus, such as UN votes on Cuba (184-2 against the embargo).

Historical Roots: From Founding Fathers to Manifest Destiny

Chomsky's narrative begins with the Founding Fathers. George Washington referred to the young U.S. as an 'infant empire,' emulating Rome and Britain. Benjamin Franklin invoked Machiavelli to justify expelling natives for settler expansion, while Thomas Jefferson envisioned a racially 'pure' nation pushing indigenous peoples into the mountains and Latin populations southward.

Key milestones include Andrew Jackson's Seminole War in Florida—a 'war of murder and plunder' bypassing Congress—and John Quincy Adams' prediction of Cuba falling by 'political gravitation.' The 1846 Mexican-American War annexed vast territories, setting precedents for expansionism. Chomsky emphasizes this continuity, debunking the 'saltwater fallacy' that labels only overseas acquisitions as imperial.

Post-World War II Global Dominance

Emerging from WWII with half the world's wealth, the U.S. planned a 'grand area' of control: the Western Hemisphere, former British Empire, and Far East. State Department planner George Kennan outlined maintaining economic disparities, assigning regions—Middle East for oil, Latin America for resources, Southeast Asia for stabilizing U.S. allies.

The Cold War, per Chomsky, was a U.S.-led assault on Third World nationalism refusing orders. Post-Cold War, invasions like Panama (1989) proceeded without Soviet checks, killing thousands to remove a former CIA asset. This era saw military budgets sustained for Third World interventions, not peer rivals.

For deeper reading, Chomsky's 2008 Boston University lecture expands on these themes: Modern-Day American Imperialism: Middle East and Beyond.

Chomsky's Seminal Books on U.S. Imperialism

Chomsky authored numerous works dissecting U.S. foreign policy. 'Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance' (2003) examines doctrines enabling global rule by force. 'Imperial Ambitions' (2005), 'Failed States' (2006), and 'Rogue States' (2000) critique post-9/11 actions, portraying the U.S. as the primary 'rogue' actor.

'Deterring Democracy' (1991) analyzes how U.S. policy deters independent development abroad. 'Who Rules the World?' (2016) updates these for the multipolar era, noting China's rise via Belt and Road Initiative challenging U.S. dominance without military bases.

Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

• Hegemony or Survival: Links historical patterns to Iraq invasion risks.
• Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on post-9/11 empire-building.
• Failed States: Argues U.S. violates international law it imposes on others.

Integration into U.S. University Curricula

Chomsky's texts appear in syllabi nationwide, particularly in international relations (IR), political science, and history courses. For instance, the Fall 2017 INS 560: American Foreign Policy at an unnamed institution lists 'Imperial Ambitions,' 'Failed States,' and 'Rogue States' as supplementary readings under Marxist and dependency theories. View the syllabus.

Other courses, like SOCL 2233 Global Social Problems at Midwestern State University, cover U.S. foreign policy and empire. PSCI 4606A at Carleton University debates theoretical underpinnings of U.S. policy. These assignments expose students to critiques of 'grand strategy' and 'new imperialism.'

Case Studies: Notable Courses and Lectures

Beyond readings, Chomsky's guest lectures pack auditoriums. His 2008 talk at Boston University School of Law drew crowds dissecting Middle East policy. Columbia University's 2009 Edward Said Memorial Lecture addressed 'The Unipolar Moment and the Culture of Imperialism.'

At the University of Arizona, where he holds a laureate professorship, courses like Consequences of Capitalism incorporate 'Deterring Democracy.' History 319 at UW-Madison examines U.S. foreign policy crises, aligning with Chomsky's timelines.

These engagements foster step-by-step analysis: (1) Historical context, (2) Policy documents like NSC-68, (3) Case studies (Vietnam, Iraq), (4) Resistance movements.

Influence on Students, Faculty, and Academic Discourse

Chomsky inspires activism; MIT students organized against Vietnam using his essays. Today, his ideas inform debates on academic freedom amid campus protests over Gaza, echoing his warnings on U.S.-backed policies.

Faculty like Aviva Chomsky (his daughter, professor at Salem State University) continue the legacy, lecturing on Latin American interventions. Surveys show political science majors citing Chomsky for nuanced foreign policy views, balancing realist and liberal paradigms with radical critiques.

Criticisms and Calls for Balance

Not all embrace Chomsky. Critics like Noah Smith argue his 'America bad' framework overlooks U.S. benevolence, such as post-WWII reconstruction or anti-fascist wars. Historians note selective emphasis, ignoring Soviet imperialism. In academia, balanced syllabi pair Chomsky with John Mearsheimer or William Appleman Williams for realism vs. revisionism.

Yet, his data-driven approach—citing declassified documents—earns respect, prompting multi-perspective discussions essential for higher education.

Contemporary Relevance in 2026

As of 2026, Chomsky's analyses resonate amid Ukraine aid debates, Taiwan tensions, and Middle East conflicts. His multipolar warnings align with China's BRI surpassing U.S. trade in Latin America/Africa. University panels reference his sanctions critiques, like Iran's post-JCPOA isolation.

Statistics: U.S. maintains 800 overseas bases; global polls rank it the 'most frightening' power, per Chomsky-cited sources.

Chomsky on Universities' Role

Chomsky critiques corporatized higher education for stifling dissent, advocating universities as 'centers for radical social inquiry.' He laments privatization edging out public access, urging intellectuals to expose power like Vietnam-era protests.

Actionable insights: Faculty can integrate primary sources (Kennan memos) for student-led analyses; departments foster interdisciplinary seminars on empire.

Photo by Maksym Tymchyk 🇺🇦 on Unsplash

Future Outlook for Critical Studies

With Chomsky at 97 post-stroke, his digital archives ensure legacy. Emerging scholars blend his views with decolonial theory, predicting vibrant discourse in political science. Challenges include funding biases favoring mainstream narratives, but student demand sustains critical curricula.

Stakeholders—administrators, donors, governments—must uphold academic freedom for robust debate on U.S. imperialism's implications.