A landmark survey has exposed a troubling shift in the United Kingdom's relationship with science. Released in early 2026, the latest Public Attitudes to Science and Technology survey reveals that public confidence in scientists is waning, with growing skepticism fueled by worries over research integrity. This decline marks a departure from pre-pandemic highs, where trust soared amid crises like COVID-19. As the UK navigates economic pressures and global uncertainties, understanding this erosion is crucial for policymakers, researchers, and the public alike.
The survey, conducted by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), paints a picture of a nation that still values scientific contributions but harbors increasing doubts about the motives and reliability of those driving discovery. With only a fraction of respondents expressing high confidence compared to previous years, questions arise about how this affects funding, policy, and everyday decision-making.
🔍 Unpacking the 2026 Public Attitudes Survey
The Public Attitudes to Science and Technology (PAST) survey, a biennial barometer since 1997, polls thousands of UK adults on their views toward science. In its 2026 edition, fielded late last year, key findings highlight a dip in trust. Just 43 percent of respondents felt 'well informed' about science, down from 51 percent in prior waves. More starkly, agreement that scientific advances benefit individuals personally fell, signaling a disconnect between societal good and personal relevance.
Detailed breakdowns show nuanced shifts: trust in university-affiliated scientists remains relatively steady, but faith in government and industry researchers has plummeted. This comes as 66 percent express some confidence in science overall, yet with qualifiers around ethics and transparency. The sample of over 2,000 adults underscores the representativeness, capturing diverse demographics from urban Londoners to rural Scots.
- 43% feel genuinely informed about science (down 8 points)
- Decline in perceived personal benefits from advances
- Greater uncertainty on researchers' integrity and intentions
These metrics, drawn from rigorous statistical analysis, reflect not just opinions but behavioral indicators like engagement with science news.
Historical Context: From Peak Trust to Current Doubts
Trust in UK scientists wasn't always fragile. During the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, polls like those from the British Science Association showed 84 percent trusting scientists to tell the truth, up sharply from 64 percent in 1997. Lockdowns and vaccines positioned experts as heroes, boosting visibility.
Post-pandemic, the trajectory reversed. By 2023, international surveys like Pew Research noted similar US declines, but UK-specific data from 2024-2025 showed early cracks. The 2026 PAST survey confirms the trend: positive perceptions of scientists dropped since 2020, amid fatigue from prolonged media scrutiny.
Timeline of key shifts:
| Year | Trust Level (% High Confidence) | Key Event |
|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 64% | Baseline PAST survey |
| 2020 | 84% | COVID-19 peak trust |
| 2024 | ~70% | Post-pandemic dip |
| 2026 | Declining | Integrity concerns rise |
This reversal prompts reflection on what sustained early gains and why they've eroded.
Core Drivers: Research Integrity Under the Microscope
At the heart of declining trust lie concerns over research integrity—defined as adherence to ethical standards, accurate reporting, and avoidance of misconduct like data fabrication or selective publishing. High-profile cases have amplified doubts.
Recent scrutiny of microplastics studies exemplifies this. In January 2026, Guardian reports highlighted errors in measuring microplastic pollution in human bodies, with scientists questioning methodologies. While retractions correct science, they fuel public wariness, echoing 2020 hydroxychloroquine study pullbacks that damaged credibility.
Other factors include perceived industry influence and funding biases. Surveys indicate 30 percent worry about commercial pressures skewing results, up from 20 percent pre-2020. Step-by-step, integrity issues unfold: hypothesis testing, data collection, peer review, publication—any lapse at these stages erodes faith.
Photo by Amanda Jones on Unsplash
Stakeholder Voices: Diverse Perspectives on the Crisis
Scientists express alarm. Roger Highfield, science editor, noted on X (formerly Twitter) the 'science paradox': high engagement but low confidence. Public figures echo this; posts on X from January 2026 highlight the PAST findings, with users debating pandemic legacies.
Policymakers face pressure. DSIT officials emphasize transparency initiatives, while critics argue underfunding exacerbates issues. The public, per the survey, values science (90 percent see benefits) but demands accountability.
- Scientists: Call for better communication
- Public: Seek verifiable, unbiased info
- Government: Push engagement programs
Balanced views from outlets like Research Professional News show segmented trust levels.
Societal Impacts: Beyond Headlines
Declining trust ripples outward. Policy adoption slows—vaccine hesitancy lingers, climate action stalls. Economically, science drives 10 percent of UK GDP via innovation; eroded confidence risks investment.
In healthcare, integrity doubts delay treatments. Environmentally, microplastics skepticism hampers pollution efforts. For individuals, misinformation thrives on platforms like X, where 2026 posts amplify poll results.
Explore research jobs to contribute to trustworthy science, or check higher ed career advice for integrity-focused paths.
Global Comparisons: UK in Context
UK trends mirror global patterns but lag recovery. Pew's 2024 US data shows trust at 57 percent positive impact, down from 73 percent in 2019. Conversely, a 2025 University of Bath study found strong worldwide trust post-COVID.
Europe varies: Germany holds steady at 80 percent, while France dips similarly. UK's unique blend—Brexit science funding cuts, NHS strains—intensifies local decline.
Initiatives to Restore Confidence
Solutions abound. UKRI's transparency pledges include open data mandates. Public engagement ramps up via festivals like Cheltenham Science Festival, reaching millions.
Media plays key: balanced reporting counters sensationalism. Education integrates science literacy in curricula. Step-by-step rebuilding:
- Enhance peer review visibility
- Fund integrity training
- Promote diverse scientist representation
- Leverage social media for facts
Success stories, like post-2020 vaccine trust campaigns, offer blueprints. For careers in ethical research, visit research assistant jobs.
Photo by Ronda Dorsey on Unsplash
Expert Recommendations and Actionable Steps
Experts advocate multi-pronged approaches. A 2025 Wiley study urges policymakers to prioritize communication, scientists to embrace reproducibility, and media to fact-check rigorously.
Public actions:
- Verify sources via Google Scholar
- Engage with local science events
- Support transparent funding
Government eyes 2026 strategies, potentially boosting DSIT budgets.
Looking Ahead: Pathways to Renewal
By 2030, renewed trust hinges on action. Optimists predict AI ethics debates as catalysts for standards. Pessimists warn deepening divides if unaddressed.
Positive signs: rising science engagement. With concerted efforts, the UK can reclaim its science leadership. Stay informed via UK academic opportunities and higher ed jobs.
In summary, the 2026 poll signals urgency, but solutions exist. Rebuilding demands collective commitment to integrity and openness. For those passionate about science, platforms like Rate My Professor, higher ed jobs, and higher ed career advice offer ways to engage and advance trustworthy research.
